By: Lahbash
As Nigeria prepares for the August 16, 2025 bye-elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is facing heavy backlash over its decision to exclude candidates of the Labour Party (LP) from the contest—a move described by political observers as a troubling sign of democratic deterioration.
The sweeping disqualification has drawn widespread criticism, particularly from the Labour Party’s leadership and affected aspirants. Among them is Adewale Michael Adesanya, the party’s candidate for Remo Federal Constituency, who was officially nominated on July 19 but is now barred from the electoral race due to what INEC termed unresolved internal party disputes.
Adesanya, a community-focused candidate popular among youth and grassroots movements, decried the development as a threat to participatory democracy. “My candidacy reflects the collective voice of many who have long been sidelined. We will not accept this quietly. Legal options are being explored to reverse this injustice,” he said.
The LP, under the leadership of Julius Abure, has rejected INEC’s decision, arguing that the commission acted beyond its lawful role. “INEC lacks the authority to prevent a party from nominating candidates once all procedural requirements under the Electoral Act have been fulfilled,” the party said in a strongly worded response.
Critics warn that the commission’s justification—citing internal LP leadership conflicts—opens the door to dangerous overreach. By assuming the role of judge in intra-party matters, INEC is, in effect, exercising powers beyond its constitutional mandate, raising questions about the impartiality of Nigeria’s electoral system.
“This action risks transforming the commission into an instrument of political suppression,” said Dr. Amina Oduwale, an electoral law expert. “In democracies, institutions like INEC should act as neutral administrators—not gatekeepers of political participation.”
Analysts argue that this type of selective exclusion undermines electoral competition and democratic fairness. In the absence of judicial intervention, such unilateral decisions by INEC could disenfranchise not only candidates but the electorate itself.
The implications are far-reaching. Nigeria’s political arena already suffers from limited diversity and dominance by mainstream parties. The elimination of alternative voices, particularly from emerging parties like Labour, stifles innovation and reform at a time when the nation faces deep-rooted challenges—including economic inequality, youth unemployment, and governance lapses.
Civil society groups have also expressed concern over what they describe as a growing centralization of power within electoral bodies. The Situation Room coalition and other monitoring groups are calling for urgent reforms to safeguard electoral independence and fairness.
“This is a wake-up call,” said Moses Abegunde, a youth activist and electoral observer. “We need to build systems where electoral decisions are subject to independent judicial review, not bureaucratic discretion.”
Meanwhile, international observers are closely watching the situation. Nigeria’s reputation as a key democratic player in Africa could be undermined if institutional biases are perceived to be influencing electoral outcomes.
Despite the setback, Adesanya remains resolute. “This is not the end of our story. It’s the beginning of a larger struggle for equity, inclusion, and justice in Nigerian politics.”
As the countdown to the polls continues, the pressure is now on INEC to either justify its decision transparently or restore the rights of disqualified candidates. Failure to do so, critics say, may not only call the integrity of the upcoming elections into question but could also deepen public distrust in the nation’s democratic institutions.
